So
a month has gone by and my Soul Search mission seems a long way behind me already.
Maybe I’ve actually got this out of my system. Maybe I don’t need to sum up
neatly. Maybe I can just say, “Been there, done that, no longer interested.”
I
started 2013 with the tentative label “post-Christian monotheist”, and I
reached the end of it without having to change that label. Am I a monotheist? I
am prepared to be a theist, in the sense that I cannot say (as the fool doth in
his heart) that there is no god with enough certainty to call myself an
atheist, and yet I’m not particularly comfortable with the idea of being an
agnostic, which is the category you might expect the unconvinced to fall into.
But
one thing’s for sure. Christianity is a thing of my past. There will be no more
churches. I can’t see myself ever again being lured towards such a belief
system. It might look attractive and simple at the outset, but scratch the
surface and you’ll spend the rest of your life trying to reconcile its myriad
inconsistencies. Of course, you could just adopt a blind-faith attitude that
stonewalls all argument and criticism, but that’s not a very mature or persuasive
stance to take.
Oh
yes, you have to be persuasive, because once you’re in, you’re supposed to
evangelise and recruit and spread the word, like a lowly latecomer in a pyramid
sales scheme. But at some point – and it may take years to reach that point –
you’ll realise you’ve been sold a pup. I realised that a long time ago, if I’m
honest about it, but I wanted to be really, really sure. And after fifty-odd churches, I'm about as sure as I can be … where
Christianity is concerned, at least. I’m not ruling out other faiths; I am in
no position to do so at this stage.
And before you ask, no, I don't think Christianity has value because it instils a sense of morality. Atheists/agnostics/secularists aren’t running around killing and robbing
each other, or if they are it’s not because they're godless. If anything,
it’s the religious folk who seem to do most damage, because their belief that their
atrocities are in a righteous cause allows them to be so much more extreme and intolerant.
Religiously
inspired codes of morality may reinforce the rules that civilised people would
come up with anyway in the absence of religion, but that doesn’t mean that
religion, or god, is the source of all morality. Anyone who says that if he/she
wasn’t a Christian he/she’d be completely amoral and would be committing crimes
left, right and centre is a person to be avoided. Being a dangerous person
whose criminal and/or immoral instincts are suppressed by Christianity is nothing to be proud
of. Being a civilised person who acts morally without needing to be told to is
more to be desired.
Nevertheless,
there are some areas in which a deity could be acknowledged – as a notional
creator, for example, and I have no problem with that concept. The literal
six-day creationists are barking, of course, but I can make room in my world
view for a first cause, however that is to be understood.
I
can also make room – indeed, I could hardly deny it room, if it’s omnipresent – for
an overarching almighty entity that is too great and mysterious to be fully
understood, however rational we try to be. But the physical paraphernalia attending
the Christian version of this entity – all thorns and nails and tail feathers –
is not the substance or manifestation of any god I can believe in.
So
that’s where I am so far. Still pondering, but not beating myself up about it.
Still doubting, but open to persuasion. And still blogging, occasionally, and trying not to get too riled by the intemperate commentators who insist on USING CAPITAL LETTERS ALL THE TIME!
Tee-hee, giggles the Soul Searcher. At least people are reading my blog -- it's been visited by people in 57 different countries. That's one for every week I've been writing it. Who'd have thought people as far afield as Benin, Chile, Qatar and Hong Kong would want to read about Edinburgh churches?